Do not sell that pallet

FROM OUR SPONSOR:

Your Best-Selling Product Might Have a Second Owner

You spend months finding a winning product.

Then thousands on creative. More on Meta. More on Google. More on Amazon.

And somewhere, a guy you’ve never met is downloading your images, cloning your product page, bidding on your keywords and enjoying the remarkably efficient business strategy of being you for free.

The worst part?

You probably don’t know how much it’s costing you.

Copycats don’t just steal the occasional sale. They can siphon off branded search traffic, undercut marketplace listings, impersonate your store, run clone ads, confuse customers and send angry buyers who got scammed straight to your support team.

So while you’re trying to squeeze another 0.3% out of conversion rate someone may be standing underneath your revenue bucket with a drill.

That’s why serious eCommerce brands need to stop treating brand protection like legal housekeeping and start treating it like revenue protection.

And that starts with knowing what’s actually out there.

Bustem scans marketplaces, websites, social platforms, ads and other channels for infringers and copycats, then combines AI detection with human verification and enforcement to get them removed.

They’ve already protected 160+ eCommerce brands and completed 100,000+ takedowns.

But before you pay them anything, they’ll show you the problem.

Bustem is offering a 15-minute 360° Threat Report at No Cost.

They’ll scan your brand, uncover copycats you may not know exist, estimate where revenue could be leaking and give you a step-by-step plan for going after them.

Because Q4 is a terrible time to discover that your fastest-growing competitor is actually just… you.

Get your 360° Threat Report at No Cost and see who’s stealing your sales. 

Congratulations, Your Warehouse Is Now a Hedge Fund

The de minimis story has taken another strange turn because apparently U.S. trade policy is being written by the same people who make Fast & Furious movies. Every six months there’s another sequel, nobody understands the timeline and somehow a shipping container is involved.

A recent court ruling has sellers asking whether this changes everything. Not exactly. The big change already happened. De minimis treatment has broadly been suspended through executive and customs action while Congress has scheduled the statutory funeral for July 1 2027. So this is less “Breaking News!” and more a doctor walking into the room six months after the funeral and saying: “We have the test results.”

The interesting part isn’t that cheap imports got more expensive. Of course they did. At this point importing merchandise into America has the pricing transparency of ordering room service in Las Vegas. “The sandwich is $18.” Wonderful. “And after fees?” - “Please don’t ask what happened."

The interesting part is inventory. Imagine you’re sitting on $2 million of merchandise bought under the old landed-cost regime. Yesterday that was inventory. Boring. Boxes. Today those boxes might be the most valuable thing in your company. Because if you landed a product for $10, but replacing it now costs $13, your old inventory has something your new inventory doesn’t: a time machine. Your accounting system still says: “Cost: $10.” Your supplier says: “Replacement cost: $13.” Your competitor says: “Mine is $14.” And your customer says: “Why does this garlic press cost $27?”

Because geopolitics, Linda. Crush the garlic.

This creates a wonderfully dangerous illusion. You sell your $10 unit for $20 and think: “Fantastic! Fifty percent gross margin!”

No.

You have just sold something for $20 that may cost $13 to replace. Your spreadsheet is congratulating you using information from the past which is also how people end up buying timeshares. Historical margin tells you how profitable yesterday was. Replacement cost tells you whether you still have a business tomorrow.

Seller One owns old inventory that competitors can no longer economically reproduce. Market prices rise, replacement costs rise and suddenly his warehouse is Fort Knox if Fort Knox contained 46,000 Bluetooth meat thermometers. Seller Two has exactly the same inventory, sells through it at yesterday’s prices, celebrates his “great margins,” reorders, sees the new landed cost and discovers he has spent six months enthusiastically liquidating his own competitive advantage.

That’s not a business strategy. That’s a going-out-of-business sale where nobody remembered to order the banner.

So stop asking only, “What did I pay for this?”

Ask: “What would I have to pay to put this exact unit back on the shelf?”

Then map every meaningful SKU against replacement cost.

That’s the asset.

A replacement-cost inventory map showing what you own, what it historically cost, what it costs to replace now, what margin survives after replenishment and which products should perhaps not be tossed into a 20%-off promotion because Brenda from Growth wants to “create urgency".

Brenda, there is already urgency. Congress created it. That's why we turned this entire mess into a playbook because “just stare nervously at your landed costs” felt insufficient.

Some SKUs may deserve higher prices. Some may deserve slower sell-through. Some may be impossible to replenish profitably. And some ugly pallet you’ve been trying to get rid of since 2024 may suddenly deserve armed guards and a tiny velvet rope. Because sellers love valuing businesses using revenue, EBITDA, reviews, rankings and growth rates. But in a sudden landed-cost reset the most valuable asset in your company may be neither the brand nor the account. It may be 30,000 units of the Premium Bamboo Expandable Drawer Organizer.

Which is humiliating.

Imagine spending seven years building a brand, hiring employees, optimizing advertising, surviving Amazon suspensions, learning supply-chain management, and sacrificing several functioning organs to Meta Ads, only to discover that the crown jewels of your entrepreneurial career are a warehouse full of bamboo rectangles.

But that’s the opportunity.

Before you discount inventory, before you automatically reorder it and definitely before you celebrate another month of “great margins,” calculate replacement cost.

Because your warehouse may not be full of products waiting to be sold.

It may be full of products you can no longer afford to buy.

13 Experts. 90 Minutes. No PowerPoints Held Hostage.

Most ecommerce webinars have a small problem: somewhere around minute 47 someone is still explaining what AI is while you quietly reconsider every decision that brought you here.

This one has a better rule.

You get five minutes. Show us something useful. Then get off the stage.

Thirteen Amazon and ecommerce experts are getting together for a Q4 AI Hack Sprint with each bringing exactly one AI-powered growth hack you can actually use this Q4.

We’re talking AI agents running PPC, finding when shoppers actually buy, squeezing more from TikTok creators, spotting organic cannibalization, mining customer reviews, geo-targeting with AMC and even figuring out which questions AI happily recommends your competitors for while apparently pretending you don’t exist.

Lovely.

13 experts. 13 hacks. 5 minutes each.

No 38-slide origin stories. No “before we begin let’s define artificial intelligence.” No presentation that could have been an email but somehow became a hostage situation.

Just a rapid-fire fight to answer one question:

Who actually has the best Q4 AI hack?

Get 13 Q4 growth hacks before someone opens slide 39

Headline Sold Separately

Walmart has apparently looked at online reviews - one of the last remaining places where a stranger named “TruckDad84” can destroy a multinational corporation because his toaster arrived “kinda beige” - and thought: we should control this more.

Enter Walmart’s Review Accelerator.

The basic idea is simple. Walmart can incentivize customers to leave reviews through its approved programs. Sellers, meanwhile, are explicitly not allowed to wander off and solicit reviews themselves.

Which is incredible.

That’s like a casino saying: “Gambling is dangerous and strictly prohibited unless you do it at one of these tables we own. Now blow on the dice!” And sellers don’t automatically get access to the magic review hose either. Eligibility can depend partly on Walmart’s proprietary demand score, a phrase that sounds less like an e-commerce metric and more like something Darth Vader checks before deciding which planet gets groceries.

Walmart’s proprietary demand score determines eligibility, but sellers aren’t told exactly how that score is calculated. So access to Review Accelerator depends partly on a number Walmart calculates, Walmart keeps secret and Walmart then uses to decide whether you’re allowed into the Walmart program. It’s less an eligibility system and more a nightclub where the bouncer is also the guest list, the dress code, and a fog machine whispering: “You know what you did.”

Fantastic. We have invented the DMV run by an oracle.

And even qualifying doesn’t guarantee inclusion. So Walmart can effectively say: “Congratulations! You are eligible to possibly be considered for the opportunity to maybe participate in asking customers to describe the blender you already sold them.” At some point you’re not running a marketplace. You’re running Squid Game for spatulas.

Because reviews are not decorative. Reviews are trust. A product with 2,000 reviews looks established. A product with four reviews looks like it was assembled yesterday in a storage unit by a man who keeps saying: “The authorities have no jurisdiction here.”

That creates an obvious problem for new sellers.

Imagine you launch a perfectly good electric kettle. It has six reviews. Next to you is MegaKettle Supreme with 2,400 reviews, five product videos, a badge and the digital body language of a British royal. Normally you might think: fine, I’ll encourage my customers to review mine.

Walmart: NO.

Okay, can I use your system?

Walmart: PERHAPS.

What do I need?

Walmart: THE ALGORITHM MUST FIND YOU WORTHY.

This is not a marketplace anymore. This is a medieval kingdom where merchants approach the castle carrying an air fryer and whisper: “Please, sire, may the peasants speak of my basket?”

And that’s the fascinating part. Reviews are presented as customer-generated reputation. They’re supposed to be the crowd talking. But increasingly the platform owns the microphone, the stage, the amplifier, the guest list and the little man backstage deciding whether your microphone is even plugged in. The crowd is still speaking. Walmart just owns the vocal cords.

And yes, there is a legitimate reason platforms want review solicitation controlled. Otherwise every package would contain seventeen cards saying: “LEAVE FIVE STARS AND WIN A JET SKI” and eventually buying toothpaste would feel less like oral hygiene and more like joining a small but extremely ambitious cult.

But there is an enormous difference between policing manipulation and becoming the Department of Authorized Opinions. Because once the platform controls the approved mechanism for accelerating reviews reputation stops being merely something sellers earn. It becomes infrastructure the marketplace administers. That matters when reputation creates sales, sales create visibility, visibility creates more reviews, and more reviews create more sales.

That is not a flywheel.

That is a hamster wheel where Walmart owns the hamster, the wheel, the electricity and a mysterious spreadsheet ranking which hamsters deserve legs.

So the next time you see Product A with 37 reviews sitting beside Product B with 3,800, remember: you may not simply be looking at what customers preferred. You may also be looking at who got access to the machinery that manufactures momentum.

Which is a very modern form of competition.

Everyone is allowed to run the race.

You just can’t bring your own shoes.

And Walmart owns the escalator.

The Store Is Dead. Long Live the Store.

For 25 years e-commerce and brick-and-mortar were portrayed as mortal enemies. Countless headlines declared the “death of retail” imagining a future where warehouses and websites made stores obsolete. Instead, we’re witnessing a great irony: online retailers are coming back home to stores. After pushing shoppers online today’s e-commerce giants are desperately depending on physical shops to win the delivery race.

See why ecommerce suddenly needs the thing it was supposed to kill

Auto-Translate Won’t Win E.U. Shoppers

In 2021 CSA Research, a Massachusetts-based consultancy, surveyed 9,909 consumers in 33 countries. Forty percent of respondents said they would not buy from a website in a foreign language.

Spectrum Expands its Community Investment and Offers Amazon Prime Membership to Qualifying Low-Income Spectrum Internet Customers

Spectrum announced it is bringing Amazon Prime benefits to eligible Spectrum Internet customers. Existing and new customers who currently qualify for Spectrum Internet Assist, affordable internet for low-income customers with speeds up to 50 Mbps, can receive Prime membership included with their Internet subscription – at no extra cost.

Inside TikTok's transparency center: AI catches 97% of removed videos

Before a TikTok video reaches the recommendation feed, machines get the first look, scanning its images, sounds and other signals for potential violations of the platform’s community guidelines.

Shopify’s CEO threatened to ban Claude Code. Anthropic had already closed the feature request

Shopify CEO Tobi Lütke is considering banning Claude Code at the company, but not because he thinks Anthropic’s coding agent isn’t good. The problem, he says, is a Markdown file.